Categories
Technical Lighting Help

A Lighting Guy Rehabs a House – The Kitchen

A few months ago I posted some statistics about the lighting in the house my wife and I just rehabbed as our “age-in-place” final home. An architect friend I have known for many years reached out, suggesting I post more about the specific “before and after” aspects of the new property. I told him, in a way, I have done that with a CEU session detailing the whole process, from a lighting standpoint. So why not break it down, room by room, in a written format? This is the first post responding to his good idea.

1980s era kitchen when we bought the house. Note the original hardwood paneling that we believe was from the 1950s.

Based on the design, my wife and I believe the kitchen in our new mid-century home was rehabbed at some point in the 1980s. The cabinets were of decent quality, but the overall look was dated and “old” feeling. In the dinette area, the original 1957 solid wood paneling was still in place, but unlike the rest of the house, this wood was stained a VERY dark, blackish-brown. An original sliding glass display case was embed in one wall. We thought about keeping both, but could not rectify their existence with the vision we had for the whole room. The paneling and display case were the only original elements we intentionally removed from the house.

“I want a pink kitchen!”

Many homes in our neighborhood are being flipped. We toured scores of them and they had one thing in common, grey kitchens. I was nonplus, but my wife hated them. Now that she had a clean slate, the sky was the limit.

While working with the cabinet designer, we were shown a sea of wood cabinets options, none of which either of us wanted or liked. We initially figured we’d end up with white, then she told the designer of her heart’s desire. He was startled. Pink cabinets were a new one for him and he was taken aback. The GC jumped in, suggesting painted cabinets as a solution.

“What color, pink?”

“Pink.”

Sherwin Williams #9692 Cotton Candy

The GC and I quickly went next door to the Sherwin-Williams store and we simultaneously reached for a subtle tone of pink, Cotton Candy. We ran back to the cabinet store and showed it to my wife. “Yes! Pink.”

After vising eight granite/stone/quartz showrooms, we finally found a countertop that would match the pink. The backsplash selection was a similar challenge. After we found the color, I designed a dozen pattern configurations and she picked her favorite. Initially, she wanted more pink on the painted walls, but I was able to talk her off that particular ledge. After deciding on blush pleated shades and a bleached white wood floor, I could then concentrate on the important part, the lighting!

One of many backspash sketches I did to secure approval from my wife.
The pink, aubergine veined quartz and burgundy backsplash all work in concert.

Good Lighting

One added trend in all the “flipped” houses we toured was the horrible flat, quasi-recessed lighting used. Almost nothing in new or rehabbed homes is as egregious as the wafer light infestation. Miserable light, that adds glare and doesn’t drop light onto the work surfaces, is not a solution I wanted. I sought out a deep recessed option and found two possibilities, Nora Sapphire III and WAC FQ. Both offered multiple beam angles, lumen output options and assorted color temperatures. I decided to use the Nora brand because they affirmed a 2 ¾” depth and WAC customer service said theirs was, “about 2 ½”.” “About” made me uneasy.

I laid out the recessed placement using both the 38° spot and the 53° narrow flood. Intuitively, I knew the 64° flood wouldn’t give me the illuminance I wanted at the work surfaces. I settled on the 53° option. I also decided on 3000K to insure a great color for foodstuffs and the room finishes. I then provided the electrician with detailed placement measurements for the housings.

These images were pasted all over the kitchen area during construction

LED Tape

I knew I needed an LED Tape manufacturer with a lot of options. I reached out to a number of Lighting Reps I know. Almost all of them told me to check out American Lighting. They were right; they offer multiple output variations, plenty of color choices and even though I wasn’t interested, they manufacture sheets, wet outdoor, COB, dim-to-warm and color-changing product as well. There are different run-length choices and even a 120V alternative.

The three layers of LED Tape – Above, Under Cabinets and Toekick – I decided against the under-counter after consulting the cabient and countertop fabricators.

Under cabinet lighting is crucial to good kitchen lighting. I used an LED Tape that pushed out over 1000 lumens per foot for that application. I like to use above cabinet lighting in the morning, so I selected the LED Tape that delivers 310 lumens per foot. This presents a beautiful indirect glow, at the start of each day. Our toekick lighting is on for most of the evening. Not much is needed, so the basic product distributing about 140 lumens per foot was adequate for that job. One vendor, three products and a solid lighting solution.

I personally installed all of the LED Tape. (The power supplies were hardwired by the electrician.) The only problem that occurred was with the connectors. While it does not say so anywhere (that I could find) the connectors are unsuitable for solid-core wire. Unfortunately, the electrician used solid core, Class 2 suitable wire to travel from the remote power supplies to the application position. I was forced to “hide” wire connectors at almost every junction point. This was frustrating and not what I expected. Installation time was tripled. Imagine if I were earning journeyman electrician wages! I hope at some point in the future, they develop a solid core wire connector. American Lighting customer service was of no help either, so that was disappointing.

Decorative

Only one decorative piece was planned for the kitchen. Because the ceilings are at 8’-0” and my wife specifically did not want a hanging pendant that could interfere with normal room navigation, we decided on a semi-flush and we wanted it to be a decent diameter. To maintain the theme of circles started by the backsplash, we sought out a unit with spherical diffusers. After considering a few others, we decided on the Visual Comfort Talia. I installed 2700K lamps to create a warmer glow from the layers of clear glass and gold frame.

A large semi-flush became a more practical option because of the walkway to the adjoining laundry room (painted “Hot” pink!)

Because I installed all of the lighting, I did appreciate the comprehensive instruction sheets and the “spare” glass baubles. While we are currently using a small café set we bought for our first remodeling project of a 9’-0” x 10’-0” kitchen, three houses ago, we think it will allow us to grow into more meaningful space in the future.

Controls

Our house is controlled with a Control 4 home automation system. We’ve tied the toekick and above cabinet lighting into the system. The toekick lighting functions as a nightlight from dusk to 11:00PM. We have not yet imagined a scenario for the above cabinet lights. Should the desire arise, we can upgrade to controllable switches for the recessed, under cabinet and dinette area lighting, but we do not yet see the need.

Switches are arranged from ceiling, down. Recessed, over cabients, under cabinets and toekick. The Over Cabinet and Toekick switches are linked to the C4 home automation system.

If you read my blogs, you likely know I don’t use many dimmers, especially in the kitchen. With four switches in the room, I can establish 24 combinations. Do I need more? It is unlikely. By selecting one of the 24, I have exactly the right amount of light.

Illuminance Measurements

How much light is enough light? In the last house, we existed for about six years before we rehabbed the kitchen. That meant BAD lighting for a long time. We also understand that old age means more light will be needed. Once you have good kitchen lighting, you cannot go back.

I took these measurements at dusk. The sky was clear, the sun had just set, but it wasn’t yet dark, so there is a bit of light coming from outside. (See first line of data.) I averaged measurements from five locations on the 17’-0” liner feet of countertop and backsplash to arrive at the number stated in the chart.

Type of LightAt Sink (located in front of window)At Front of CountertopCountertop at Backsplash
Dusk via Windows17.0 fc1.86 fc1.02 fc
Recessed Only109.0 fc81.66 fc19.0 fc
Under Cab Only38 fc247.6 fc318.4 fc
Above Cab Only29 fc21.06 fc7.96 fc
Recessed & Under Cab *136 fc334.0 fc323.2 fc
All Lighting On **150 fc338.2 fc333.4 fc

* Most popular option for cooking

** Rarely used

As you can see from these measurements, the layered approach to light really makes a difference. Consider the following:

  • While the recessed lighting delivers an adequate level of light at the front of the countertops, darkness looms at the work surface near the backsplash
  • With only the recessed light, shadows are a concern on the countertop. Hence the need for other lighting emanating from a different direction.
  • Conversely, if the under cabinet lighting is used alone, the countertops are well lit, but the remainder of the room, not near an upper cabinet (see sink) is left in the dark.
  • Toekick lighting which delivers about 150fc on the floor, under the toekick and 17fc on the floor, 2” from the toekick edge, do not add an appreciable level of light to the work surfaces.
  • The over cabinet lights, likewise add only negligible levels of light to the countertops (compare last two lines of stats, the difference being the addition of upper and toekick lighting)
  • This means the toekick lighting and the above cabinet lighting perform very specific tasks. Crucial nighttime navigation and supplemental lighting as the morning light breaks. In addition, they carry a much heavier aesthetic load, especially when used together during times of entertainment.

In these numbers, it is easy to quantify a statement everyone in the lighting industry says repeatedly. For proper illumination, multiple layers are needed.

Final Thoughts

I had intended to include under-counter lighting to wash the front of the lower cabinets and illuminate open drawers. I included them in the previous house and found them helpful, but the design of the cabinets and placement of the countertop would have rendered them somewhat ineffective. I abandoned the idea after a few conversations with the fabricators. I also elected to use ceiling mounted audio speakers after realizing the minimal exposed space above the cabinets. Our previous house had 8’-5” ceiling heights. (Yes, I know. Odd.) With so little space, I decided to place the bookshelf speaker in another room. That meant two more holes in the ceiling. Statistically, we have the right light. We also feel we have good lighting that meets our daily needs.

Our cat, Kit giving everything a final inspection!

Upon closer inspection, even our cat, Kit agrees!

If YOU have any thoughts, I’d love to hear them! Look for additional posts covering other room throughout 2026.

Categories
Aesthetic Lighting Help

LEDucation 2026

Photo by Google DeepMind on Pexels.com

For years, people asked. “Did you go to LEDucation?” I remember submitting a proposal to speak at the inaugural version of this event years ago. My proposal wasn’t selected and I did not participate. Subsequently, for many reasons, I have not attended, until this year. At the end of 2025, I was asked if I would participate in a roundtable conversation to be offered to attendees. I agreed. Finally, there was a reason for me to go. When I later found it would be a pre-recorded virtual session, I decided to attend regardless.

It is impossible to ignore the impact of this show. Some have said it singlehandedly decimated LightFair. That may be an exaggeration, LightFair lost its way a few years back. LEDucation was in the right place at the right time to take advantage of a sleeping monster. I now hear lots of rumblings about Lightapolooza, a Texas-based lighting show. Both offer a lot of educational options and both are regional. While I have always found the education at LightFair to be the primary reason to attend, most people didn’t go for that reason. They wanted to connect with the suppliers they use, see if they should consider some new options and find out what is new and innovative to determine if this is something they should consider in the future. That feature unfortunately disappeared. These smaller, local shows now seem to have an advantage over the large and costly national shows because they combine both needs, in addition to being close to home and small enough to visit in a day.

Here are my thought on this vibrant show. I’ll divide the comments into LED and EDucation sections.

LED (The Show Floor)

I do not think there is another square inch of space in the New York Hilton. The layout is like an M.C. Escher print. I do not think you could have packed more people into the space available. Booths are (almost) uniform in size, aisles are (basically) set in grids. Meaningful conversation and product demonstrations were occurring everywhere. I probably said, “Excuse me” more times per hour than ever in my life. This is everything you want in a trade show. It reminds me of my first KBIS in Chicago and my first ICFF in Las Vegas. The electric in the air made this, “the place to be and be seen.”

Of course, the majority of the products and services are geared toward commercial lighting, interior design and architecture. As a residential person, at any show I attend, I try to figure out what could translate, what could inspire and what are we missing in the residential space. Here are a few things I found interesting.

A-Emotional Light

A-emotional Light – LEDucation 2026
A-emotional Light – LEDucation 2026

The shade material shown by this Spanish company was different, exciting and very subtle. I was immediately relaxed. After looking at their website, I realized the small sampling was indicative of the line. Most products use painted stainless steel mesh as a diffuser. I was surprised to see the wide variety of looks that could be achieved with this interesting material choice.

Moss

Moss – Emily Pendant Chandelier – LEDucation 2026
Moss – Dune Spiral Chandelier – LEDucation 2026

I was attracted to the Germany firm, Moss and their rounded-triangular, pyramidal metal shades of the Emily collection. Why haven’t I seen other shades this shape? The Dune Spiral piece they also displayed in the booth did a nice job blending a small light source amidst the formed metal. Perhaps a bit too much glare for some applications, but I did like the overall look.

https://www.mossobjects.com/

Terzani

Teranzi – Dragon Chandelier – LEDucation 2026

There was something ferocious about the new Terzani chandelier, Dragon. This was unlike most “soft” approachable luminaries. The spiky cast brass is meant to make a statement No light is integral to the cast sculpture. Instead, downlight spots are built into the canopy, aimed at the suspended polished casting. This piece is indicative of what I’ve been saying recently. This is art that happens to include illumination, sold as a luminaire. Expect more of this.

https://www.terzani.com/en/home

DCW éditions

DCW editions – Focus pendants – LEDucation 2026

The Focus collection featured in the DCW booth consists of light rings filled with obscured clear lenses. Once the light is energized, the glass adopts a planetary look. Some appear as if they were soap bubbles. Suspended on mobile frame, the constant movement enforces this bubbly, solar system feel.

https://dcw-editions.com/en-us

Nulite

Studio by Nulite – LEDucation 2026

Many offices are now using slender, non-glare luminaires that drive a lot of light onto the work surface. The same demand is required in kitchens. Studio by Nulite could easily slip into residential spaces providing the same needed output, but adding the reduction of glare. I love the shape, style and colors, too!

https://nulite.lighting/

Lodes

Lodes – Kinno path and spread landscape lighting

In a sea of rather pedestrian landscape lighting, Lodes, an Italian firm displayed Kinno, unique in that the stems were intentionally irregular in shape, as if they were swaying in the wind. The organic nature of the support rods added to their blending in a natural outdoor environment. The shades featured a full diffuser at its underside, for better, more natural light distribution. I really liked these.

Lumos Cielo by Baganti

During one of the education sessions, the speaker talked about the inevitability of illuminated walls and ceilings. The even delivery of light is more comfortable and the light delivery is better for what our body needs. While these panels are suited for commercial spaces, I wonder how this will translate to residential design. Are full or partially illuminated surfaces, rather than individual luminaires, in our future?

https://lumoscielo.com/

Tiny

We have spent so much time, since the introduction of LED concentrating on the light output, we haven’t dipped very deeply into the shape-specific options that are available. Years ago, I remember asking if the engineers could drive specific shaped output from the LED so we could feature unique shapes of light emitted from landscape luminaires. At the time, they could not. Two vendors were showing small outputs. LedNer Optoelectronics featured very small shaped distribution of light. Minimus had ultra-tiny architectural accent lights and spot lights. (Think about a landscape spot, the diameter of a dime x 1 ¼”. Output is low, around 50 to 100 lumens of light.) Scores of booths showed 1” and ½” recessed and spots. Optique by Alloy LED displayed miniature aluminum extrusions with smaller profile LED inside. With full output, smaller form sizes and unique output, we still can expect to see more and different LED options.

https://optique-lighting.com/

Viva Lyte

Viva Lyte – LEDucation 2026

Perhaps the coolest thing on the show floor was this LED flat panel-like display concept. Imagine LED on a 3M material. The 3M material is applied to clear glass or acrylic like wallpaper. The material appears as a miniature “grid” of LED diodes while the glass/acrylic remains translucent. When the grid is energized, it functions much like a flat screen. Images, videos, logos, designs, etc. can be fed into the driver and displayed on the translucent material. It can work on windows, dividers and probably solid surfaces (not sure of the value there, but….) Think of how this could be used as protection against an almost invisible glass door. Could it be a decorative feature on a fixed shower panel? My mind was rolling with the possibilities.

https://vivalyte.com

EDucation (Virtual and Live)

Full disclosure, I participated in one of the virtual education sessions and I can say from firsthand knowledge, they were WELL attended. Far more people than I had expected. The same was true for the live events held during show hours. I attended three and well over 100, perhaps 200 people were at some.

One session detailed how the Geographic Information System (GIS) (the brains behind GPS) is used to understand the health implications of outdoor lighting. I also listened to Dr. Mariana Figueiro’s talk on how lighting supports health and wellbeing. She is an excellent speaker and really at the forefront of lighting and health. The connection is now almost irrefutable. A session on how lighting can be used to instigate more/better brainstorming and also provide a supportive environment for employees was discussed. Perhaps the best session was a panel of experts who talked about sustainability. While this is a growing factor in commercial lighting, it has not yet touched the residential side of lighting. I say yet, because commercial concerns almost always influence what we do in the home. Look for additional information on this topic as I try to wrap my head around the data and focus in on how it might find its way to the residential side.

I had a great time, saw a lot of interesting things, engaged in many meaningful conversations and feel I took away a lot of new ideas. These are the exact notions you want to carry home, once you leave an industry event. It has been a long time since I felt this value from attending a show. It reminds me why I became a repeat visitor to so many and also why I stopped going to most trade shows. Now if we could only bottle up this magic.

Categories
Technical Lighting Help

Does Energy Certified Lighting Really Save Energy?

In my last blog post, I provided some building stats on my wife’s and my new rehabbed home. I also indicated that, despite being well lit (in my opinion!) it did not meet many energy efficient watts per square foot standards.

To achieve LEED certification for a residential property, a lighting power density of 1.1W per square foot is the minimum. (I did reach this benchmark.) By decreasing the power density, points are awarded. The more points awarded to a home, the higher the LEED certification. If I bring the power density down to 0.72W/Sq. Ft. I could earn 0.5 point. 0.60W/Sq. Ft is awarded 1.0 point and a power density of 0.48 would earn me 1.5 points. These accumulated points allow one to earn higher levels of certification.

If I would have reduced some of the lighting I could have easily meet the first tier LEED requirements of 0.72, but then, the impact would have been reduced. This point has begun to upset me. I understand that it is possible that some homeowners might always turn on all the lighting all at once, so the only fair assessment is to include everything. That is unfortunate because that is not how most people live in their homes. Lights go on and off as needed, where needed. With fewer options, the higher consuming luminaires will always be used, thereby using a larger quantity of power than one which offers the homeowner choice.

Let’s take three examples of the shortsightedness of total lighting power consumption in the kitchen, bathroom and outdoor lighting.

Kitchen

The kitchen is a galley design with a dinette at the far end. It measures 7’-6” x 23’-6” or 179.36 square feet. The room has an 8’-0” ceiling height. I placed a large semi-flush decorative unit over the dinette. In the food preparation area, I used six recessed cans, undercabinet lighting, toekick lighting and lighting over the top of the cabinets. Each are controlled separately. The LED Tape has a different lumen output for each location.

TypeQuantityWattage EachTotal Wattage
Recessed611W66W
Undercabinet13’-0”7W / Ft.91W
Above Cabinet25’-0”3.65W / Ft.91.25W
Toekick25’-0”2.19W / Ft.54.75W
Dinette113.2W13.2W
Total  316.2W

Using 316.2 watts of electric to illuminate 179 square feet puts the efficacy at 1.76 watts per square foot. Still within the average, but well above the LEED cutoff and nowhere near the optimums of 0.7 to 0.48. That number supposes all lights are engaged at all times. In the year we have lived in the new house, we can think of no time when all five switches were live. There are multiple illumination options for a reason.

When I wake in the morning, I like the above cabinet lighting. I do not turn on anything else. The indirect glow is relaxing and easy. That means, I’m using 0.51 watts per square foot. My wife only uses the undercabinet lighting, consuming the same approximate levels of electricity. When cooking, the overhead recessed lighting and undercabinet lighting are both used and result in the heaviest consumption in the room at 0.88 watts per square foot. In the evening, only the toekick lighting is employed, demanding just 0.31 watts per square foot.

What’s more, the toekick lighting is used for the greatest amount of hours, controlled by the home automation system to turn on at dusk and off at 11:00PM.

Ignoring the dinette area for a moment, if I didn’t have four switches controlling four different light options, I would most likely need to increase the output of the current cans or select a different recessed cans with a smaller beam angle, then use more of them. When the current units are supplemented with the undercabinet lighting, it is the perfect placement and level of light for food preparation, but if I removed the under cabinet tape to meet LEED, I’d need a bit more output from the ceiling. I could use the more powerful 16W unit with the same beam angle. Conversely, I could specify a unit with a shallower beam angle which would deliver a higher level of light on the countertops. Not perfect, but ok. Using a narrower beam angle would however mean nine units, plus the dinette. That total of 112.2 watts delivers 0.63 watts per square foot. (Swapping the six to a higher output option would deliver something similar.) By eliminating light layering and the energy saving toekick lighting, I can now qualify my lighting for the higher level LEED certification, but would I want to? The energy consumed calculates to less, but in practice, we’d have no option but to always use all the light. I’d only have one light switch! That means, in practice, the higher “LEED” qualified lighting option would require more electricity than a good layered lighting design. I can’t imagine that was their intent.

Bathroom

My wife and I believe the secret to a happy and successful marriage is separate bathrooms. In the new house, one (hers) has been designed for wheelchair accessibility. Regardless, they are lit essentially the same. I used mini-pendants to flank the mirror, she wanted sconces. Painted surfaces, while different colors, are both deep, rich colors. Her porcelain tile is basically white with deep blue veining. My tile is celadon, so she benefits from a touch more reflectance.

Her bathroom is 11’-0” x 6’-0” (66 square feet.) My bathroom is the same length but 5’-6” width, with an extra opening space at the door, so my area is 67.8 square feet. Each shower area is lit with two recessed cans. The mirrors are flanked by the decorative pieces; a recessed can is mounted directly over the drain. Under each vanity is a strip of LED Tape connected to two step lights for nighttime navigation.

TypeQuantityWattage EachTotal Wattage
Recessed311W33W
Mini-Pendant (His)224W48W
Sconce (Hers)233.9W67.8W
Step Lights24W8W
Under Vanity2’-0”2.19W / Ft.4.38W
   93.38W / 113.18W

93.38 watts illuminate 67.8 square feet of my bathroom for an efficacy of 1.38 watts per square foot. Because she chose different lights at the mirror, her bathroom needed 113.18 watts to support 66 square feet. Her power consumption is 1.71 watts per square foot.

Like almost everyone, bathrooms are fully illuminated for less than an hour each day. Shower, personal grooming and you’re out of the room. From that point, there are only periodic visits. One of the most common accidents for seniors is falling and it is most chronic during nighttime visits to the bathroom. We all think we know the way, but nonetheless, falls occur. A curled-up cat, a stray ball of that day’s socks tossed on the floor and balance is lost. Having low-level light and a clear path from bed to the bathroom is essential as we age. In our scenario, the under-vanity and step lights are the hardest working fixtures in the bathroom. They consume a miniscule 12.38 watts of electricity, but can be lifesaving.

If I were trying to reduce my total home wattage consumption, these would be a great candidate. Honestly, from a cost perspective, the LED Tape is a good candidate, too. To run the strip of light under each vanity, I needed a power supply. The low-output tape is inexpensive, but most manufacturers sell only a 30W power supply as the smallest option, so a lot of money is needed to prevent a nighttime fall. Because the power consumption is so low, it won’t help the efficacy much. I’d likely need to remove something else, perhaps one of the recessed lights in the shower area and also eliminate the recessed unit over the sink. I could also replace the two flanking lights at the mirror with a single over-mirror option, That would probably get to the reduced power levels for acceptability.

While it saves energy, it runs counter to good lighting practices. The older eye is very sensitive to glare and becomes more so as cataracts become worse. Lights flanking the mirror are one of the best ways to ameliorate the impacts of glare. Light from three directions avoids shadows, making personal grooming easier. In larger shower areas, one light introduced more shadows and does not provide adequate illumination, hence the reason for two. We could eliminate some of the light to meet efficiency goals, but the price paid is not really worth it. Again, to achieve a higher level of efficiency and earn LEED (or some other standard) certification, poorer quality lighting is needed and more electricity will likely be consumed.

Outdoor

The surface mounted lighting on the exterior of our “Y” shaped ranch consists of two types. Recessed units are positioned under the eaves, over all the doors around the perimeter and a few additional places. Articulated spots are located in four other areas.

TypeQuantityWattage EachTotal Wattage
Recessed1011W110W
Spots430W120W
Total  230W

Exterior lighting is gaining more regulations, almost on a weekly basis. The state of Maine just introduced some of the toughest Dark Sky legislation in the country. A Hawaii law is on the horizon. Less light and less offensive, or visible light will be demanded in the future.

I included these, because of their home automation control. The home security cameras are linked with the lighting, so 99% of the evening, they are off. When the camera detects a human or an automobile, I have them configured to activate. Activation is also geographic, so if a car pulls into the driveway, the spot over the garage illuminates. If a human is detected in the western back patio, the light over the dining room door turns on. If a person appears on the bedroom patio, the lights at that door are energized. For most of the evening, they are dark. Interlopers are the only reason for their use. From an energy saving certification standpoint, I’m consuming 230W of power. From a realistic point of view, that is only the case if a bad-guy decides to intrude at night and then, only a portion of the 230 watts will be consumed.

I could have sealed up all of the recessed eave lighting and removed the outlets that service the spots. This would have given me a more efficient home, but we would not have the “bad guy” deterrent the automated lighting provides.

I love the idea of energy savings. I want the country to be less reliant on fossil fuels. I’m OK with mandates to reach those goals. I am, however, a lighting guy. I’ve spent the larger part of my career trying to get people to use better lighting solutions. When those worlds collide, I want to find resolution. Is there a way to combine better lighting with these important efficiency demands? Could the inclusion of a home automation system trigger provisos covering light source use? Could lighting, used primarily as nighttime navigation be removed from calculation? I don’t want to sacrifice good lighting for efficiency, especially when I know, the efficiency measurements will actually demand extra electric use. That’s just not right.

https://www.usgbc.org/credits/homes/v4-draft/eac13?return=/credits/homes/v4

Categories
Aesthetic Lighting Help Lighting Commentary

Some “Good Lighting” Stats

If you’ve read any of my recent blog posts, you’ll know, my wife and I just moved into a new, rehabbed mid-century ranch. The house was rat-infested, filled with mold, had holes in the roof and otherwise, only partially functional. My wife likes to say, “We built a whole new home inside an existing shell.” While that may be true, we were careful to maintain at least 90% of the original character. Walking into the front door, all of the living spaces are exactly as were envisioned in 1957. Sadly, an original bathroom could not be saved as water leakage compromised the supporting floor joists underneath. 1980s era remodeling of the main bathroom and kitchen were not worth the effort to save. We think the house is now a perfect blend of reverence to the past and functionality for today and tomorrow.

Because the lighting and electric was barely viable, up to and including problematic Federal Pacific electric panels, a full rewire with all new lighting was required. This has allowed me to make some observations about the state of residential lighting, at least in this one small instance.

I have been involved in lighting for over fifty years, so I’ll add two provisos. First, I spent more time than the average homeowner thinking about the lighting I wanted and where I wanted it placed. Secondly, I probably used more lighting than most remodelers or designers would typically specify. That said, I believe I have created a nice lighting design for our home and I have solved the consistent lighting complaints we both lived with in our previous homes and their rehabilitation projects. In addition, while our vision is good right now, statically, more and better lighting will be needed as we age. It was easier to add the light at this juncture, rather than later, when we’re less suited to deal with it.

Some Stats

  • 26 outlet box mounted luminaires (12 of which are utilitarian flat-panel flush mounted luminaires plus 2 monopoint spots.)
  • 52 recessed units and recessed housings
  • 223 feet of LED Tape (four different types)
  • 32 lighting strips totaling 71’-0” illuminate the clothes closets
  • 15 remote power supplies (for tape and lighting strips)
  • 14 step lights
  • 4 exterior spots
  • Scores of cables, connectors & clips, for the assorted lighting systems

Stat Calculations

  • 28% of the fixtures purchased were outlet box mounted
  • 72% of the lighting was a functional systems, placed in, above, below or behind architectural elements of the structure
  • 29.6% of the budget was spent on outlet box mounted lighting
  • 70.4 % of the budget was spent on functional lighting
    • If we include the utilitarian, surface-mounted items as functional lighting, that number jumps to 76.7%

Project Stats

  • 2600 square feet of livable space (includes a basement studio/office/entertainment space) 3105 square feet includes garage, which was also lit.
  • 2902.18 watts are consumed if ALL luminaires are engaged
  • 0.93 watts of lighting energy per square foot
  • 7% – percentage of total budget was dedicated to lighting. If initial cost of the building is included, (this was a rehab) the number falls to 5.6%.

As I look at these numbers, they reflect what I have suspected and mentioned here over the years.

  • Functional lighting is heavily outweighing decorative lighting in quantity, dollars and impact to the room at a pretty substantive level.
  • As a percentage of new home or remodel budgets, lighting needs to be increased. I suspect my number, at 5-7% is higher than most. Many people believe 10% is a better number. The electricians on the job parroted that, indicating our house was the most involved they had ever done. While there was a room or two in their past, a whole-home of correct lighting hasn’t been normal. That means, there are a lot of poorly illuminated houses out there.
  • Despite my large number of lighting options, my watts/square foot umber fell below most averages of 1.0 to 2.5. Not where it needs to be if I wanted LEED, or some other energy saving certification, but pretty low. (More on this point in the next blog post.)

When I started work in this field, well over 90% of lighting used in a home was outlet box mounted decorative. A handful of recessed pieces were used in select spots and undercabinet lighting was, if used, fluorescent strips. 2’-0” x 4’-0” fluorescent boxes in the kitchen were soon replaced with a grid of 6” recessed cans. Bedroom bent glass was replaced with bowls, then ceiling fans. Hallway bowls were swapped for more recessed. Now, many bath strips are being supplanted with illuminated mirrors. Fluorescent undercabient was replaced with Halogen, then Xenon and now LED Tape. The ease of LED Tape, to say nothing of the reduced cost, has made accent lighting much more viable. All of these transitions are visible in my “real world” lighting installation. Are we, as professional lighting people dedicating the correct percentage of our efforts to the right categories? I’m not sure we are. We seem to spend an inordinate amount of time on decorative products and not enough on functional.

I also worry about our failure to push for better lighting. I often play a game when the new issue of Architectural Digest magazine arrives. I count the visible, decorative lighting fixtures in each article/issue. The number was shockingly low when I first started. As we moved toward the minimalistic 2010s, it got even smaller. Recently, the number is increasing because designers are doing exactly as I expected, they are featuring one or two key luminaires in a space. Lighting fixtures have moved from functional distributors of light to art that also provides some light. What hasn’t changed is the overall poor lighting found in almost every article in the magazine. If you’ve made it into Architectural Digest, there is no question, the design and implementation of the space is breathtaking. The furniture, wallcoverings and window dressings are flawless. You can’t help but be envious. Look a little deeper and the lack of usable light in the majority of the rooms is astonishing. Millions were spent on the redecoration, but only a couple of thousand dollars was spent on lighting that will allow you to see the space and live in the house.

The lighting design I provided for our new/old (last) home solved multiple problems, too little light, too much glare, poorly located lights and light oblivious to our security needs. Combined with a home automation system, the home lighting functions almost without our intervention. To achieve that, more systems-based functional lighting was needed than decorative outlet box mounted products. I’m not sure I’m an anomaly. As an industry, are we balancing this need correctly? All we need do is check out the statistics.

Categories
Aesthetic Lighting Help

Are Trends a Nuisance?

Photo by Stephen McDaniel on Pexels.com

I have had a delightful “back and forth” conversation about trends with my closest friend for many years. While I had a career in lighting, he was a PR executive, concentrated primarily within the residential products space. He is more likely to push back against change and of course, I am inclined to embrace the “new” even when it might be to the detriment of good logic. At the conclusion of every email chain or tavern conversation between us two old retired guys is the agreement that change ALWAYS triumphs, like it or not.

The New York Times has an engaging compilation of the major trends and inventions that have matured kitchens over the last 100+ years. It tells of the background of the kitchen triangle, when the “open concept” first grabbed the interest of homeowners and recounts some of the innovations we now take for granted. This article is naturally pointing out the thing we now find indispensable to the function of a home. Score one-point for Jeff.

My friend’s score would heavily outweigh mine with the “hottest things” that DID NOT make the list. We don’t all have a steam oven, despite a couple of decades of manufacturers telling us it is essential. We don’t have a breakfast bar in our Primary Suite, few of us have a dirty kitchen (prep-kitchen) in our home and even fewer of us have a horizontal shower. Basically, my friend wins. We ignore far more than we adopt.

In the article, they asked seven questions. I asked him to send his answers to me and thought we could compare notes.

  1. We both agree on kitchens. 55% of the readers agreed that the kitchen should be “a little separate” rather than open.
  2. Jeff wins on freezers. My friend, unlike 76% of the readers does not believe the freezer should be on the bottom. He doesn’t like the “side” freezer option either, preferring the top. The very practical reason, he simply, “Doesn’t like to bend over for ice.” A good point.
  3. We are again alike on the indispensability of a microwave or an air-fryer. We both have microwaves, but use them infrequently. Neither of us have an air-fryer (although I have a toaster oven with the feature.) 86% of those polled voted for the microwave.
  4. We both agree that one island is enough. I actually prefer no island and have never had one in a house. 90% of the people agree there is no reason for two islands.
  5. I think subway tile is over. My friend still likes it; so do 66% of the respondents. One point for my buddy.
  6. I believe open shelving in a kitchen is great, if you don’t cook in your kitchen. It also takes a lot of aesthetic skill to make an open shelf kitchen work. My friend and 87% of the public agree. With too much stuff, you need the cabinets closed.
  7. My friend prefers an eclectic style for his kitchen, so he reluctantly voted for the “colorful and cozy” option. I want everything as “streamlined and sleek” as possible. 76% agreed with my friend.

We agreed with the collective four times, he voted with the population on two additional points. I only agreed once, so my friend is more in tuned with the general population than me. Nuts. I thought for sure I knew what people wanted. I can hardly wait for the next time we have a beer together and discuss the latest household trends. I just know I’m going to win that conversation!

Categories
Technical Lighting Help

The Lighting Industry’s Response to Current US Energy Policy

Here are a few realities about US electricity.

  • The US federal government has pulled its support or hindered alternative power sources such as solar, wind and battery.
  • Inefficient and dirty coal-run electric power plants are regularly being decommissioned. Natural gas fueled plants are also shutting down. Some for these two reasons, others because they are simply at a natural “end of life” and can no longer function properly. Most are not being replaced.
  • Electric demand is on the rise, primarily from data centers being added to support an Artificial Intelligence (AI) boom.
  • The rest of the US electric grid (substations, high-voltage transmission lines and local distribution lines) is OLD, in poor health and crumbling.
  • Electric rates are increasing.

According to the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, (NERC) “Long-Term Reliability Assessment” of January 2026, this combination of events will result in a higher levels of blackouts, impacting tens of millions of users over the next five years.

The most vulnerable area is Texas. Apparently, Texas is like Hawaii, in that its grid is not largely connected with the greater national system. They are also seeing an increase of residents, industrial demand, data centers and bitcoin mining. Their grid isolation led to the 2021 power failure that resulted in over 200 deaths and makes them extremely vulnerable for future blackouts and losses. They are not alone, The Upper Mid-west, the Mid-Atlantic and the Pacific Northwest were also cited as vulnerable.

Add to this what we already know. (According to the Energy Information Agency [EIA] 2020 report and research done by the University of Minnesota on this topic.)

  • Americans experience an average of six hours of electrical disruption per year.
  • North Carolinians experience 30 hours of electrical disruption, five times the national average and twice as much as #2 Vermont.
  • The United States has more power failures than any other developed nation.
  • Americans experience more time without electricity than eight other industrialized countries.
  • Power failures in 2012 were ten times more common than in 1985.
  • Power failures doubled from 2003 to 2012.

What Do Lighting Folks Do?

It is time to take resilient lighting more serious. We can all buy some clunky battery backup light that looks like it was designed for a garage, but you wouldn’t want to put it anywhere else. If regular power outage is our new reality, we’ll need a recessed can (that looks like all the other cans in our ceiling) with backup power. We’ll need a decent looking flush mount and perhaps semi-flush luminaire that functions once the power disappears. There will need to be multiple styles, sizes and finishes. Building codes should be adjusted to require a handful of resilient luminaires in crucial spots across the home. To meet the needs of consumers, they should mimic their non-resilient sister. We should not suffer aesthetically because our power grid in not being protected by our elected officials. We need to do better.

I live in an older, inner-ring suburb of Cleveland that is supplied by underground electric from the 1925s to 1950s. We lose electric regularly; on an average of six times per year. As we rehabbed our mid-century ranch (also in the same neighborhood) we wanted to protect ourselves from this inevitability. We were okay with the occasional loss of electricity, (we’ve been here almost 25 years, it’s a reality of our life) except for the loss of heat. I wanted some sort of battery back-up for the thermostat and igniter/pilot. The furnace (and before it, the boiler) were gas powered. Once started, the natural gas would function fine. The only thing preventing a warm house was a small, low-voltage “spark” from the thermostat. Nothing was available. Everyone looked at me like I was asking for a gold-plated raccoon. Their only solution was a whole-home generator. That’s like using a gold plated .50-caliber rifle to kill the gold-plated raccoon. Perhaps the HVAC community won’t help, but lighting could be a better partner for homeowners.

The NERC report does provide some good news. California is no longer considered a vulnerable location for blackouts. After years of weakness, they now have a solar-powered grid of batteries ready to serve as backup, should the need arise. If only other states and the federal government would adopt this solution, we wouldn’t be in such a pickle. Until then, it’s up to lighting people to help America live with rolling blackouts by dedicating more resources to the creation of well thought-out, aesthetically pleasing, resilient lighting.

You know I love a big tranche of data! This report is chock full of good information. To read the entire report:

Categories
Technical Lighting Help

The Complex “Cost of Electricity” Data

Photo by Efe Burak Baydar on Pexels.com

Recently, my LinkedIn feed has been filled with conversations about the cost of electricity, likely due to the noticeable surge in price. Most include a graphic and many include dated or erroneous/suspicious information. I don’t think people are being malicious, this is a complex topic and the supportive data is equally fraught with confusion.

Energy vs. Electricity

When a point is being made about energy consumption that does not necessarily mean electricity. If you look at the US energy Information Administration (EIA,) energy is defined as electricity, natural gas and heating oil and propane. Some statistics even include the cost of gasoline and diesel fuel because it is energy we consume. Even more broadly, we could include the cost of coal, hydropower, solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, ethanol and uranium because they are used in the creation of electricity. None of these are wrong observations, but what information is right for a viable assessment of cost and cost savings?

As lighting people, we can’t really impact home heating and gasoline has little bearing on watts consumed to illuminate a space. The cost of coal, hydro or nuclear power are baked into our price per kilowatt-hour of electricity. That said, it might be easy for us to home in on the price of electricity, but that too, is complex.

The Different Prices for Electricity

Electric companies across the United States sell electricity at different rates to different entities. There are residential, commercial, transportation and manufacturing rates. There is also a combined average. If you are like me and have spent a career concentration on residential lighting, the residential price per kilowatt-hour is all that you need. Commercial lighting people will need the commercial and industrial (manufacturing) numbers to help aid in justifications.

States, Regions and National

Data is collected across states; states are accumulated into regions and a national average is finally calculated. All those numbers are made available and by themselves, are correct. So which do you use?

It is important to note that the price of electricity varies wildly across the nation. Hawaii is always the highest in the country, the Northeast corridor typically makes up the remainder of the “Top10” with Alaska and California also in that top ranking. The least expensive electricity seems to change each year from the bottom ten states. That means the national average should be considered just that, an average.

2024 Stats

(A note, about EIA stats. Yearly numbers take a few months to accumulate. The 2025 averages will likely be published sometime mid-year to the third quarter. For that reason, most people will be using the 2024 number for the next few months.)

The average price for electricity to the ultimate residential customer in 2024 was 16.48¢/kWh. For the commercial businesses, 12.75¢/kWh, Industry paid 8.13¢/kWh and the transportation sector price was also12.75¢/kWh. Across all four sectors, the average was 12.94¢/kWh.

https://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/table.php?t=epa_02_04.html

To understand the wide variation of prices, the EIA breaks the data down. In 2024, Hawaii, of course had the most expensive residential electricity in the nation at 42.86¢/kWh and North Dakota enjoyed the least expensive electric cost of 11.51¢/kWh, almost four times less. The commercial, industrial and transportation sectors, by and large, fall into similar proportional rankings.

https://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/table.php?t=epa_02_10.html

Hawaii is the most expensive because it is an island-state. It must generate all of its electricity on the islands. Buying or selling excess production is not possible, hence the high prices. Alaska also finds itself in the same position for the same reason. Within the contiguous United States, high prices are borne by densely populated areas and low prices are enjoyed in sparsely populated states. For that reason, California, New England states and New York comprise the list of the most expensive contiguous states.

The cheapest electric rates have a few anomalies. Washington is always on the list, because of the large amount of hydro generated power. Tennessee is also a constant primarily because of the TVA. The other states have smaller and more rural population, in general.

Twenty Years

I have been talking about electrical consumption for over twenty years. To help designers, lighting professionals and consumers understand the benefits of energy efficient lighting, first fluorescent, then LED, I talked about the long-term or lifecycle cost of lighting. To give people a better understanding of the financial reality, we looked at first cost PLUS the cost of electricity over the lifespan of the luminaire, knowing full well, electricity would increase.

When I first started delivering talks on lighting energy consumption, the 2004 national average cost of electricity was 8.95¢ per kWh. That means the average cost of residential electricity has increased 84.8% in twenty years! Has your salary increased 84% in that time? If not, more of your discretionary dollars are being used for non-discretionary needs.

As I began my research, I remember reading that electric cost had not really experiences huge jumps in the decades prior to 2004. Later, listening to a speech given by the CEO of ComEd, I learned that those rates were stable primarily because the market was continuing to grow. In the early 2000s, growth was difficult and even impossible. Fewer households were being formed, it was getting very difficult, almost impossible to build a new power plant and because of age, the power infrastructure was in dire need of replacement. She promised at the time, “Rates will/must go up.” Today, we are hearing that electric rates are rising primarily because of the massive draw required by data companies to facilitate Artificial Intelligence (AI.) To undertake this massive level of computer processing a lot of electricity is used. What’s more, it takes a lot of electricity in a country where almost no added electric creation is being built. No new output with substantial new demand and only limited ways to increase efficiency do not make for a good future. The short prognosis must be, rapidly increasing electric rates. Aren’t you glad the federal government cancelled all those wind and solar energy creation initiatives? (Sarcasm implied.)

But there is one more wrinkle, PUCs. Public Utility Commissions regulate the electric rates for regions and states. Because they are political organizations they may be resistance to increase rates commensurate with demand and reality. If that becomes the case, then expect electric reliability to fade. When the money is not available, maintenance is the first thing to suffer. Our 100 year old electrical infrastructure is in poor health. Things will break. Users have a horrible choice ahead of us, pay more for electricity or assume outages as a typical way of life. Sorry for the Sophie’s Choice, but this also explains the increased introduction of resilient lighting product.

I’m actually very pessimistic as we enter the second quarter of this century. America was finally looking at energy creation alternatives, but the Luddite community persevered. Even if we make substantial changes to our government makeup, progressive initiatives do not just restart in an instant. All this occurred while China continues to decommission coal power plants and increase non-fossil fuel alternatives. We could quickly enter a time with rapidly increased electric cost for a supply that is unreliable. I’m not sure I like that prognosis.

PS: To my Canadian friends and readers, SORRY, I have not done twenty years of research on Canadian rates, but I do know that Canadian utility companies have been far more proactive than US concerns. Hopefully you’re not in the same boat!

If you want the best information available on energy, check out the US federal government’s excellent resource, The Energy Information Administration:

https://www.eia.gov/

Categories
Technical Lighting Help

The Health Cost of Energy Efficiency

Since I have spent time trying to understand the health implications of light, I have read scores of scientific reports on the subject. The work of Dr. Mariana Figueiro is of course very central and most people in the lighting industry have had the privilege to read and listen to her talk about practical solutions for light and health. The name that comes up second is Dr. Martin Moore-Ede. He has probably been a louder voice with a perceived higher level of worry about the new LED and how they interact with human health.

His most recent realm of concern has been aimed at how LED manufacturers achieve more (and more) efficient LED light sources. He believes that the newer LED are eliminating output in specific color ranges to achieve the required efficacy. By so doing, the human body is not receiving enough light to satiate the demand of certain opsins in our body.

As you know, I’m not a doctor. Lord help us if indeed that were the case, so I’ll try to explain this as simply as I can, one lighting person to another. If you’re a doctor or a scientist, please stop here and read another blog post!

You, me and all other humans have a series of opsins in our body. These opsins are receptors in our eye’s photoreceptors that detect light in their various wavelengths and responds in some sort of predetermined physiological way. For example, Opsin #1 provides us with color vision and Opsin #2 allows us to see in minimal light and the dark. Most every LED works fine delivering light in this wavelength range.

Opsins #3, #4 and #5 are non-visual opsins. Receiving light in their required wavelength aid in human health. If an inadequate amount of light is delivered in these wavelengths, human health suffers. The correct amount of light at 480nm drives our circadian cycle, thanks to the work of Opsin #4. Opsin #3 requires light at 430nm and Opsin #5 requires a wavelength of 380nm. All three help regulate glucose levels, energy and retinal refraction. The increase in myopia (nearsightedness) is linked to reduced levels of the violet-rich (380nm) light needed by Opsin #5.

Light at the far-right end of the visible spectrum, moving into infrared light is likewise important for human health. This light, peaking at 825nm, is not detected by opsins because it has the ability to penetrate deeply into the skin. Proper amounts of light in this range have shown to improve blood flow, skin health and assorted healing properties.

Imagine you are a caveman or an early farmer, living off the land with no electric light. Much of your life is spent outside, planting, foraging, playing or cleaning. Daylight naturally delivers light in the full spectrum. The body receives an ample quantity in each wavelength, for each purpose. Skip ahead to today where children play inside and adults work in an indoor office or factory. To get the proper amount of light in the proper wavelength we must rely on artificial light.

Full spectrum LED lighting can provide light across all wavelengths, thereby delivering all the light needed for human health. As efficacy requirements are raised and consumers demanded less expensive options, manufactures have built LED that produces light across a narrower band of light. Most of the lumen measurement is concentrated in the green-yellow range (500nm-600nm.) While less expensive, they fail to provide the lower and higher wavelengths needed by these opsins and our skin.

Where Does That Leave Consumers?

The easiest answer is, “Spend more time outside!” Of course, that is somewhat impractical in today’s world. Your second option should then be natural light indoors. Place work desks near windows, prevent light inhibition, avoid using fenestration materials that filter out light wavelengths (if you have the option) and as a last resort, buy better lighting.

The color spectrum of natural light stretching across the area visible to humans

This is an image of the color spectrum of natural light across the area visible to humans. (380nm to 750nm) Ultraviolet light would be off the chart, on the left and infrared light is situated off the chart, on the right. While there are some peaks in the blue area, most of the colors are equally and evenly delivered.

If selecting artificial daytime light, you want to look at a spectrum diagram of the light and select one that is as close to this as possible. It is important to know that artificial daytime light should ONLY be used during the day. We need great light during the day and minimal levels of warm/red light at night. Using full spectrum light at night might have an adverse impact on our circadian system. Again, go back to our analogy of a pre-electricity farmer. Even on a great day, the sun did not shine for 24 hours. Think of a full spectrum light as a replacement for sun, not a light bulb. (Some full spectrum LED is available with a nighttime mode that removes the blue, thus creating a warmer evening illumination.)

Remember too, Full Spectrum lighting is NOT the same as Daylighting. Most daylight LED is simply 5000K to 6500K and not likely to be spread across the full spectrum. Full spectrum lights do not have to be 5000K or 6500K, but might.

One more thing. The sun is very bright. Light bulbs are not the same as the sun. You can get the right color of light from a lamp, but not the same amount. Think of full spectrum artificial light as a supplement to the sun, not a replacement.

I hope this has helped a bit. This remains a complicated issue. We are hoping artificial light can alter lifestyle changes. Perhaps it can help, but it is unlikely to replace the body’s need for sunlight. When possible, get outdoors, plant some flowers, drag the laptop onto the patio when you’re working and do your homework on a lawn chair. Your body will thank you…and you’ll sleep better, too.

Categories
Lighting Commentary

Guns and Ruth Asawa

Ruth Asawa: A Retrospective – MOMA 2025

I had a designer friend who loved guns and military pageantry. Admittedly, this is not your typical combination of profession and advocacy, but good design comes from many places and he delivered a lifetime of excellent, saleable designs.

One Monday morning, he arrived in the office with a pile of sketches and scraps of paper and quietly got to work. His weekend was spent at an antique armaments show and he became fascinated with the hand-tooling and fine engraving he found on the old firearms. For the next few months he used this inspiration in a wide variety of designs. “See this element, it’s based on a gunstock pattern I saw at the arms show.”

I thought of my late friend while visiting the Ruth Asawa show at the Museum of Modern Art (MOMA) in New York last November. I became aware of Ms. Asawa’s work a few years back at a Museum of Art & Design (MAD) exhibit. I was so intrigued by her single piece in the show, I photographed the museum label. When I learned MOMA would be doing a life retrospective, I could not wait. I was more than amazed at her vision, but also by her prolific and varied output.

The most larcenous takeaway from the Asawa show for a lighting product person is her collection of crocheted wire, hanging forms. Through their creation, Asawa was trying to explore density, form continuity and lines. The idea was born from her teaching art to tribal Indian youth. When not teaching, she spent time with the village women who were master basket weavers. The technique so interested her that she asked one of the women to teach her and she took that skill and wrapped a substantial portion of her creative career around it.

These forms would make wonderful luminaire products. Some shapes are perfect shades, others lend themselves to floor lamp and torchiere bases. The transparency lends themselves to tiny LED and the airiness would allow them to disappear into a designed space and make a statement, all at the same time. They are remarkable.

While walking down Lexington Avenue ten or twelve years ago, I passed a gallery displaying the artwork of a Japanese artist. I couldn’t stop staring. I took a quick photo and went about my trendspotting. The whole day and into the next week, I could not get this idea out of my head. For the next year I began digging the essence of the idea out of my head and into reality. Once I figured out how I could realize the idea, I began making pieces.

If I showed you the Japanese art and what I have been making, you might not make the connection. We are miles away. Nonetheless, without the initial jolt of inspiration, I might not have created these pieces. The same goes for almost every creative person I know. An idea, regardless of how far afield, can shock the system, but you never know in which way.

Why do I frequent art museums? For multiple reasons, but one is without question. You never know what piece or what artist will light a fire that could take multiple years to contain.

Categories
Lighting Commentary

Man Ray and Me

Man Ray – Rayograph – 1923

Last year I read the engaging biography, “Kiki Man Ray” by Mark Braude, a book about Kiki de Montparnesse, companion and muse to artists Man Ray. While in New York this fall I had the opportunity to view the mesmerizing new exhibit at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, “Man Ray: When Objects Dream.” In both the book and the exhibit literature, it was explained that Man Ray came to photography almost by accident. He originally went to Paris to further his painting career, but realized his passion upon discovering the wonders of photography and what could be done beyond conventional “picture taking.”

As many of you know, I studied architecture, with hopes of a career in design and building, but a part time job in lighting tore me away. The evolving industry kept me engaged for over 50 years. Over the years I have met many people who, like Man Ray and me, did not follow an expected path, but still enjoyed a rewarding career.

My old boss, while studying at Carnegie Tech helped sculptor, David Smith prepare some of his work. Whenever we visited the Cleveland Museum of Art, he was drawn to the brutal welded piece (Pilgrim) featured in the center of the contemporary gallery, at the time. While he was an excellent lighting designer, I think some portion of him secretly wanted to weld steel artwork. Another talented lighting designer really wanted to do toy designs. I’ve met accountants who wanted to create video games, marketing people who hoped for a life in comedy and sales people who really wanted to create musical theater.

It is easy to discount this in two ways. Many people say you should only follow your dreams, otherwise you will be unsatisfied. Others feel the fantasy job is a pipe dream. The real world tells us there is limited room in multiple professions. Part of growing up is buckling down and taking the work that is available. I like to consider an alternative to those ideas.

I don’t know if I would have been a good architect, but I was pretty good in my lighting career. I think there are many people, probably all the people I mentioned above and many of my friends who could succeed in almost any career, within reason. An acquaintance from high school became a bus driver. I do not think I could have survived that job choice and he probably wouldn’t have excelled in lighting. Within reason, we might all be suited for multiple avenues of employment. Some will be interesting, others a bit more boilerplate, but there can be lots of ways to earn a living.

I used to joke, no child pines for a career as a “lighting person.” Doctor, fireman, baseball player, sure, but the talented people I have encountered in my life as a lighting person have made significant contributions to the industry. They have earned the friendship of scores of people and have aided in the profitability of the folks who owned the company, or the company they started. Within the slice of time we are allotted on this planet, should we ask for more?